Suppliers and providers
A contract review checks whether performance duties, payment and risk allocation match what the business can deliver.
Commercial contract review in Germany · Berlin · advising across Germany
Commercial contracts allocate opportunity, responsibility and risk. A useful review identifies both the problem and a negotiable alternative.
Who it is for
Management, procurement, sales and operations have different priorities but need a shared understanding of the obligations.
A contract review checks whether performance duties, payment and risk allocation match what the business can deliver.
Teams receive a prioritised view of negotiating points and proposed wording for the next round.
Decision-makers can weigh the most material legal and commercial exposure before approval.
Advice
Advice separates significant risks from secondary details and provides concrete drafting alternatives.
The review starts with clauses that affect price, delivery, liability or whether the deal can be performed.
Material risks are paired with wording that can be put to the other side.
Open points are carried through to the final draft without letting secondary issues delay the deal.
Contact
Send the draft, transaction background and timeline. I will respond on scope and the issues likely to matter most.
How we work
Commercial objectives and dealbreakers are clarified before review, internal alignment and negotiation support.
Request counselYou explain your role, negotiating position, desired outcome and deadline. The agreement, schedules and previous changes are reviewed together.
The review separates dealbreakers from points that can be negotiated or handled operationally. Material clauses receive drafting alternatives.
Changes are consolidated into a coherent draft. Support can extend to counterproposals and a final consistency check.
Practical perspective
The following points explain typical decisions and dependencies in this area of advice.
The test is whether the contract accurately describes the transaction and can be carried out in practice.
A list of abstract risks does little for the negotiating team. Significant points are paired with proposed language and a commercial explanation.
The length and condition of the draft, schedules, negotiation history and requested output all affect the work involved. These are clarified at the outset.
Your contact: Dr. Philipp Lerch, attorney · Content last updated: 24 September 2026
Dr. Philipp LerchProfile
As an attorney with experience at an international business law firm and an additional background in computer science, I combine corporate law expertise with a clear understanding of business models, processes, and technology.
FAQ
Please send the current draft and schedules, a brief description of the transaction, your role, any existing mark-up and the desired timing.
Depending on the agreed scope, the result can be a prioritised assessment, wording changes in the document or assistance through negotiation. The expected output is agreed at the start.
That depends on the deal. Scope of work, price, term, liability, rights in deliverables and change control often determine the commercial exposure.
Timing depends on the draft, schedules, previous negotiations and requested depth. Once those are available, the scope and deadline can be assessed.
Length, complexity and the desired work product are relevant. After an initial look at the draft and objective, the fee for the defined engagement can be discussed.
Contact
Send the draft, transaction background and timeline. I will respond on scope and the issues likely to matter most.